← Back

CLASS 6A · District 18-6A

Clear Creek Wildcats

Enrollment: 2,483 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#191

was #191

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1136

#191 of 249

OVR Grade

71.1

#191 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Humble Kingwood (0-0) 1718	8% (-23)	—	—	—	—
2	@#47Houston Memorial (0-0) 1907	4% (-31)	—	—	—	—
3	@Channelview (0-0) 1063	58% (+3)	—	—	—	—
4	@Clear Springs (0-0) 1594	13% (-18)	—	—	—	—
5	Barbers Hill (0-0) 1822	5% (-27)	—	—	—	—
6	#13Dickinson (0-0) 2378	< 2% (-50)	—	—	—	—
8	@Deer Park (0-0) 1800	6% (-27)	—	—	—	—
9	Clear Falls (0-0) 1685	9% (-22)	—	—	—	—
10	@Clear Brook (0-0) 739	84% (+16)	—	—	—	—
11	Clear Lake (0-0) 965	67% (+7)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 18-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		13	Dickinson (2) Gators	89.9 2378	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.7-0.3	> 98%	D1
2		58	Barbers Hill (8) Eagles	81.5 1822	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.9-2.1	90%	D2
3		63	Deer Park (1) Deer	81.1 1800	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.8-2.2	88.6%	D1
4		78	Clear Falls (4) Knights	79.4 1685	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.2-2.8	73.4%	D2
5		94	Clear Springs (3) Chargers	78 1594	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.8-3.2	46.1%	—
6		191	Clear Creek (6) Wildcats	71.1 1136	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.9-5.2	< 2%	—
7		210	Clear Lake (5) Falcons	68.5 965	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-5.8	< 2%	—
8		233	Clear Brook (7) Wolverines	65.1 739	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.5-6.5	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Clear Creek’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2015

11-1

Rating 656 (88th)

#2 · 2010

9-4

Rating 618 (82nd)

#3 · 2014

7-4

Rating 593 (76th)

#4 · 2013

9-2

Rating 588 (74th)

#5 · 2023

7-5

Rating 573 (70th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	3-7	1184	12.3	30.6	−18.3	1520	−19.9	−1.3	−18.6	1034	−3.98	+0.09	−4.07	433(23rd)
2024	3-7	1148	13.8	31.3	−17.5	1622	−15.3	−1.0	−14.4	1141	−3.64	+0.23	−3.87	444(26th)
2023	7-5	1680	21.3	22.2	−0.9	1627	−2.4	−8.0	+5.6	1640	−0.84	+1.08	−1.92	573(70th)
2022	2-8	1292	19.7	29.4	−9.7	1594	−6.1	−0.7	−5.4	1365	−4.97	+0.86	−5.84	483(38th)
2021	3-8	1403	23.2	33.9	−10.7	1719	−1.6	−1.1	−0.6	1486	−3.42	+0.19	−3.61	506(46th)
2020	5-4	1465	24.4	27.4	−3.0	1479	−1.2	+1.3	−2.5	1438	−1.77	+0.58	−2.35	501(44th)
2019	4-7	1370	26.5	32.4	−5.9	1525	−1.7	+2.5	−4.2	1395	−3.63	+0.31	−3.94	491(41st)
2018	4-6	1282	33.4	35.7	−2.3	1476	+1.2	+5.3	−4.1	1398	−3.53	+0.32	−3.85	484(38th)
2017	3-6	1360	33.3	44.0	−10.7	1616	+5.8	+11.9	−6.2	1345	−2.63	+0.84	−3.48	485(38th)
2016	5-5	1599	25.1	20.6	+4.5	1546	−2.3	−7.8	+5.4	1635	−2.33	+0.51	−2.83	545(60th)
2015	11-1	2058	44.0	24.0	+20.0	1574	+16.2	−7.0	+23.3	2081	+2.98	+3.12	−0.14	656(88th)
2014	7-4	1706	38.2	22.6	+15.5	1560	+10.5	−6.4	+16.9	1922	−1.15	+1.63	−2.77	593(76th)
2013	9-2	1684	42.6	26.5	+16.1	1478	+14.4	−1.2	+15.6	1889	−0.01	+1.13	−1.14	588(74th)
2012	8-3	1575	33.6	22.9	+10.7	1410	+3.3	−4.0	+7.3	1684	−0.86	+0.92	−1.78	551(62nd)
2011	6-5	1549	23.2	24.8	−1.6	1529	−4.0	−2.8	−1.2	1470	−2.16	+0.80	−2.96	522(53rd)
2010	9-4	1899	33.5	22.4	+11.2	1667	+9.0	−8.7	+17.7	1943	+1.06	+2.82	−1.76	618(82nd)
2009	4-7	1130	23.3	30.6	−7.4	1586	−0.7	+4.3	−4.9	1376	−4.44	+0.79	−5.23	477(36th)
2008	4-6	1537	23.3	23.7	−0.4	1555	+0.6	−1.6	+2.2	1555	−3.19	+0.99	−4.18	534(56th)
2007	5-6	1554	22.9	22.8	+0.1	1575	+1.7	−2.1	+3.8	1594	−2.56	+0.91	−3.47	542(59th)
2006	4-7	1348	19.6	21.6	−2.0	1612	−3.4	−4.4	+1.0	1525	−4.36	+0.96	−5.32	514(50th)
2005	5-6	1397	22.2	27.6	−5.5	1493	+0.4	+6.6	−6.2	1345	−3.34	+0.92	−4.26	507(47th)
2004	0-10	1021	6.5	29.3	−22.8	1536	−16.4	+4.9	−21.2	969	−7.55	0.00	−7.55	414(18th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.