← Back
CLASS 6A · District 27-6A

Cibolo Steele Knights

Enrollment: 2,886 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#17
was #17
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
2273
#17 of 249
OVR Grade
88.3
#17 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@San Antonio Reagan (0-0) 1685
92% (+24)
2
@#12Humble Atascocita (0-0) 2401
37% (-5)
3
#18Lake Travis (0-0) 2244
53% (+1)
4
Converse Wagner (0-0) 1169
> 98% (+44)
5
@San Antonio Pieper (0-0) 1661
93% (+24)
7
San Marcos (0-0) 1583
95% (+28)
8
Converse Judson (0-0) 1481
96% (+32)
9 98% (+36)
10 98% (+37)
11
@Schertz Clemens (0-0) 1372
98% (+36)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 27-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 17
Knights
88.3
2273
0-0 0-0 6.8-0.2 > 98% D1
2 83
Warriors
79
1661
0-0 0-0 4.6-2.5 87.7% D2
3 97
Rattlers
77.9
1583
0-0 0-0 4-3 76.4% D2
4 118
Rockets
76.3
1481
0-0 0-0 3.4-3.6 54.5% D1
5 148
Hornets
74.8
1378
0-0 0-0 2.7-4.3 28.8%
6 151
Buffaloes
74.7
1372
0-0 0-0 2.7-4.3 26.5%
7 156
Cougars
74.4
1354
0-0 0-0 2.5-4.5 21.6%
8 185
Thunderbirds
71.6
1169
0-0 0-0 1.4-5.6 4.4%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Cibolo Steele’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2016
14-2
Rating 796 (99th)
#2 · 2015
14-1
Rating 778 (98th)
#3 · 2014
13-2
Rating 773 (98th)
#4 · 2011
15-1
Rating 748 (97th)
#5 · 2012
14-1
Rating 748 (97th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 11-2 2142 41.1 16.0 +25.1 1565 +16.0 −11.9 +27.9 2198 +1.75 +2.07 −0.32 691(93rd)
2024 11-2 2146 54.4 21.1 +33.3 1650 +28.4 −8.6 +37.0 2426 +2.22 +2.47 −0.26 710(95th)
2023 13-2 2341 40.7 18.8 +21.9 1675 +14.5 −13.2 +27.7 2193 +3.80 +4.01 −0.20 707(94th)
2022 11-1 2233 38.2 19.2 +18.9 1715 +13.2 −15.3 +28.5 2212 +4.05 +4.24 −0.18 681(92nd)
2021 11-1 2224 29.7 14.2 +15.5 1754 +9.1 −16.8 +25.8 2146 +4.25 +4.43 −0.19 693(93rd)
2020 9-3 2245 26.5 17.7 +8.8 1871 +6.0 −17.7 +23.7 2091 +2.82 +3.53 −0.71 692(93rd)
2019 8-3 2196 34.4 19.5 +14.8 1821 +13.4 −14.3 +27.7 2192 +2.49 +2.89 −0.40 682(92nd)
2018 8-4 2068 26.9 21.1 +5.8 1836 +5.2 −13.0 +18.1 1954 +1.73 +2.59 −0.85 641(86th)
2017 9-5 2322 30.4 20.6 +9.8 1946 +10.7 −17.6 +28.3 2208 +2.87 +3.31 −0.43 725(96th)
2016 14-2 2608 37.8 16.3 +21.4 1919 +18.8 −19.8 +38.5 2463 +5.98 +6.07 −0.09 796(99th)
2015 14-1 2545 39.2 13.9 +25.3 1857 +15.7 −23.0 +38.7 2468 +6.46 +6.48 −0.02 778(98th)
2014 13-2 2515 35.6 13.1 +22.5 1823 +16.0 −19.5 +35.4 2386 +5.55 +5.62 −0.07 773(98th)
2013 12-2 2501 46.4 18.1 +28.2 1645 +21.0 −13.4 +34.4 2361 +3.44 +3.87 −0.43 739(97th)
2012 14-1 2468 42.3 13.3 +29.0 1629 +18.0 −15.8 +33.8 2344 +4.25 +4.29 −0.03 748(97th)
2011 15-1 2419 35.6 14.4 +21.2 1743 +12.6 −17.0 +29.6 2240 +6.08 +6.18 −0.09 748(97th)
2010 14-2 2378 34.6 18.2 +16.3 1657 +11.2 −11.7 +22.8 2071 +4.62 +5.83 −1.21 722(96th)
2009 1-1 1684 24.0 14.0 +10.0 1548 −2.3 −13.2 +10.8 1770 −0.47 +0.04 −0.51
2008 3-0 1696 27.7 10.7 +17.0 1451 +2.1 −13.9 +16.0 1899 +0.50 +0.50 0.00
2007 1-0 1523 20.0 14.0 +6.0 1240 −4.3 −2.0 −2.3 1442 +0.03 +0.03 0.00
2006 1-0 1510 9.0 6.0 +3.0 805 −28.5 −4.5 −24.0 901 +0.03 +0.03 0.00
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.