← Back
CLASS 6A · District 24-6A

Cedar Park Vista Ridge Rangers

Enrollment: 2,496 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#91
was #91
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1601
#91 of 249
OVR Grade
78.1
#91 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Lake Belton (0-0) 1578
52% (+1)
2
Austin Bowie (0-0) 1700
40% (-4)
3 63% (+5)
4 58% (+3)
5
Leander Rouse (0-0) 1250
81% (+14)
6
@Hutto (0-0) 1693
40% (-4)
7
#23Austin Vandegrift (0-0) 2164
9% (-23)
8 86% (+17)
10
#49Cedar Park (0-0) 1896
23% (-12)
11
@Leander (0-0) 803
97% (+32)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 24-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 23
Vipers
86.6
2164
0-0 0-0 5.5-0.5 > 98% D2
2 49
Timberwolves
82.6
1896
0-0 0-0 4.6-1.4 > 98% D2
3 76
Hippos
79.5
1693
0-0 0-0 3.8-2.2 93.1% D1
4 91
Rangers
78.1
1601
0-0 0-0 3.3-2.7 85.1% D1
5 174
Raiders
72.8
1250
0-0 0-0 1.9-4.1 14.6%
6 184
Patriots
71.7
1173
0-0 0-0 1.6-4.4 8.1%
7 228
Lions
66.1
803
0-0 0-0 0.4-5.6 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Cedar Park Vista Ridge’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2020
6-3
Rating 585 (74th)
#2 · 2025
7-4
Rating 574 (70th)
#3 · 2019
8-3
Rating 571 (69th)
#4 · 2023
7-4
Rating 560 (66th)
#5 · 2024
6-5
Rating 534 (56th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 7-4 1764 30.7 26.5 +4.2 1572 +2.0 −6.0 +8.0 1699 −0.57 +0.94 −1.52 574(70th)
2024 6-5 1604 26.3 28.9 −2.6 1561 −1.8 −1.9 0.0 1501 −1.98 +0.74 −2.71 534(56th)
2023 7-4 1647 18.5 17.1 +1.5 1567 −5.5 −10.2 +4.7 1617 −0.56 +1.53 −2.08 560(66th)
2022 5-5 1547 19.0 26.5 −7.5 1675 −3.1 −4.6 +1.5 1538 −1.39 +0.87 −2.26 530(55th)
2021 4-6 1501 19.0 26.0 −7.0 1648 −6.0 −5.0 −1.0 1476 −2.81 +0.26 −3.07 513(49th)
2020 6-3 1767 34.6 24.0 +10.6 1687 +8.5 −6.4 +14.8 1871 +0.12 +1.50 −1.38 585(74th)
2019 8-3 1725 40.2 31.6 +8.5 1542 +10.0 +0.2 +9.8 1746 +0.75 +1.66 −0.91 571(69th)
2018 1-9 1073 14.8 45.6 −30.8 1610 −11.8 +13.0 −24.9 878 −5.63 +0.04 −5.68 397(14th)
2017 4-6 1295 27.0 39.0 −12.0 1681 +0.1 +5.4 −5.3 1367 −2.29 +0.25 −2.53 482(37th)
2016 3-8 1210 21.5 37.8 −16.3 1731 −1.2 +6.9 −8.1 1297 −4.09 +0.35 −4.45 466(32nd)
2011 1-1 1297 24.5 14.5 +10.0 1244 −6.9 −8.3 +1.5 1537 −0.93 +0.03 −0.96
2010 2-0 1351 29.5 21.0 +8.5 1095 −2.2 −3.0 +0.7 1518 +0.13 +0.13 0.00
2009 1-9 1190 20.1 34.2 −14.1 1658 −4.2 +3.3 −7.5 1313 −5.60 +0.08 −5.69 469(33rd)
2008 2-8 1246 22.9 36.3 −13.4 1732 +3.0 +6.3 −3.3 1418 −3.91 +0.47 −4.38 489(40th)
2007 0-2 1213 15.0 30.5 −15.5 1554 −10.5 +1.6 −12.2 1195 −1.79 0.00 −1.79
2006 1-1 1364 17.0 21.0 −4.0 1244 −16.1 +1.0 −17.1 1072 −0.86 +0.05 −0.90
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.