| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @St. Joseph Academy |
82% (+14) | W 32-21 | 1368 | −4.1 | +1.1 | +0.04 | — |
| 2 | Brownsville Rivera |
96% (+31) | W 44-20 | 1282 | −0.4 | +8.4 | +0.01 | — |
| 3 | UANL (Mex) |
89% (+20) | L 3-49 | — | — | — | — | −0.97 |
| 4 | @Brownsville Hanna |
96% (+30) | W 21-20 | 790 | −21.7 | +6.7 | +0.01 | — |
| 5 | La Joya (3-3) 963 |
91% (+22) | W 56-49 | 1124 | +10.4 | +25.4 | +0.02 | — |
| 7 | @San Benito (4-2) 1282 |
80% (+13) | L 14-17 | 1083 | −16.8 | −0.2 | — | −0.94 |
| 8 | PSJA (2-4) 934 |
89% (+20) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Harlingen (4-2) 1428 |
50% (+0) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @Los Fresnos (3-3) 1360 |
57% (+3) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | PSJA North (5-1) 1798 |
18% (-15) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
CLASS 6A · District 32-6A
Brownsville Veterans Memorial Chargers
Enrollment: 2,297 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#136
was #113
Record
4-2
0-1 district
Elo
1432
#136 of 249
OVR Grade
75.6
#136 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
70.4
#175 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
68
#188 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1129
#180 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 32-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Brownsville Veterans Memorial’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2024
8-4
Rating 542 (59th)
#2 · 2012
9-3
Rating 496 (43rd)
#3 · 2025
7-4
Rating 493 (42nd)
#4 · 2015
7-4
Rating 479 (36th)
#5 · 2014
6-4
Rating 456 (29th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.