← Back
CLASS 6A · District 32-6A

Brownsville Veterans Memorial Chargers

Enrollment: 2,297 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#121
was #121
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1478
#121 of 249
OVR Grade
76.3
#121 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@St. Joseph Academy
82% (+14)
2
Brownsville Rivera
96% (+30)
3
UANL (Mex)
88% (+19)
4
@Brownsville Hanna
96% (+31)
5
La Joya (0-0) 933
91% (+22)
7
@San Benito (0-0) 1261
71% (+9)
8
PSJA (0-0) 938
91% (+22)
9
@Harlingen (0-0) 1406
58% (+3)
10
@Los Fresnos (0-0) 1479
50% (0)
11
PSJA North (0-0) 1658
32% (-7)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 32-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 85
Raiders
79
1658
0-0 0-0 3.9-1.1 97.2% D2
2 121
Chargers
76.3
1478
0-0 0-0 3-2 87.7% D2
3 120
Falcons
76.3
1479
0-0 0-0 3-2 87% D1
4 144
Cardinals
75.2
1406
0-0 0-0 2.6-2.4 78.6% D1
5 171
Greyhounds
73
1261
0-0 0-0 1.9-3.1 44.2%
6 215
Bears
68.1
938
0-0 0-0 0.6-4.4 5.2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Brownsville Veterans Memorial’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2024
8-4
Rating 542 (59th)
#2 · 2012
9-3
Rating 496 (43rd)
#3 · 2025
7-4
Rating 493 (42nd)
#4 · 2015
7-4
Rating 479 (36th)
#5 · 2014
6-4
Rating 456 (29th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 7-4 1315 36.1 21.1 +15.0 1054 +0.2 +4.3 −4.1 1398 −3.05 +0.41 −3.46 493(42nd)
2024 8-4 1516 36.9 20.7 +16.2 1151 +3.8 +2.2 +1.7 1542 −2.82 +0.55 −3.37 542(59th)
2023 0-2 1125 21.0 29.5 −8.5 1515 −4.7 +0.6 −5.3 1369 −1.63 0.00 −1.63
2022 1-1 1247 31.0 15.5 +15.5 1513 +5.5 −11.9 +17.4 1936 −0.73 +0.04 −0.78
2021 0-1 1209 9.0 34.0 −25.0 1669 −10.0 +2.6 −12.6 1186 −0.93 0.00 −0.93
2019 1-0 1348 26.0 21.0 +5.0 756 −15.5 +4.5 −20.0 1000 +0.00 +0.00 0.00
2018 1-0 1336 50.0 13.0 +37.0 500 +3.5 +5.8 −2.3 1442 +0.01 +0.01 0.00
2017 2-1 1318 34.0 27.7 +6.3 1209 +0.7 +6.8 −6.1 1348 −0.58 +0.06 −0.64
2016 2-1 1255 20.7 21.7 −1.0 1099 −15.4 +1.8 −17.2 1069 −0.80 +0.04 −0.84
2015 7-4 1292 34.1 27.2 +6.9 1189 +0.9 +6.8 −5.9 1352 −2.64 +0.40 −3.03 479(36th)
2014 6-4 1121 33.6 25.2 +8.4 1120 −0.6 +7.8 −8.4 1289 −3.35 +0.17 −3.52 456(29th)
2013 5-5 1077 26.4 23.0 +3.4 990 −11.4 +5.1 −16.5 1087 −4.28 +0.04 −4.32 426(21st)
2012 9-3 1357 31.0 18.1 +12.9 1007 −4.5 +2.8 −7.3 1317 −1.86 +0.53 −2.38 496(43rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.