← Back

CLASS 6A · District 19-6A

Brazoswood Buccaneers

Enrollment: 2,536 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7

Rank

#165

was #148

Record

3-3

2-2 district

Elo

1292

#165 of 249

OVR Grade

73.5

#165 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

72.7

#148 of 249 in 6A

DEF Grade

67.5

#189 of 249 in 6A

Perf

1199

#171 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	AOS	ADS	WQ	LQ
1	Santa Fe	31% (-8)	W 57-34	1755	+22.6	+12.4	+0.11	—
2	@Galveston Ball	20% (-13)	L 14-45	918	−10.1	+13.1	—	−0.70
3	Pasadena Sam Rayburn (1-6) 637	92% (+23)	W 38-7	1374	−6.8	−1.8	+0.01	—
4	@#23Alvin Shadow Creek (5-1) 2203	2% (-35)	L 0-61	936	−6.8	+15.7	—	−0.20
6	Pasadena Dobie (2-4) 1248	45% (-2)	W 13-3	1452	−18.7	−16.8	+0.11	—
7	@Pearland Dawson (3-4) 1551	43% (-3)	L 31-56	757	+0.2	+30.0	—	−0.84
8	Pasadena Memorial (3-4) 1123	67% (+7)	—	—	—	—	—	—
9	@#28Manvel (5-1) 2101	3% (-32)	—	—	—	—	—	—
10	Alvin (0-6) 678	93% (+25)	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	@#12Pearland (7-0) 2385	< 2% (-44)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 19-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		12	Pearland (2) Oilers	90 2385	7-0	5-0	47.6	9.9	7.7-0.3	> 98%	D1
2		23	Alvin Shadow Creek (6) Sharks	87.2 2203	5-1	4-0	42.7	8.5	6.9-1.1	> 98%	D2
3		28	Manvel (9) Mavericks	85.7 2101	5-1	3-1	46.5	8.0	6.2-1.8	> 98%	D2
4		109	Pearland Dawson (5) Eagles	77.4 1551	3-4	3-2	24.6	32.4	4.7-3.3	89%	D1
5		170	Pasadena Dobie (1) Longhorns	72.8 1248	2-4	1-3	17.3	33.0	2.8-5.2	4.7%	—
6		187	Pasadena Memorial (3) Mavericks	70.9 1123	3-4	2-3	22.7	41.1	2.8-5.2	3.8%	—
7		165	Brazoswood (7) Buccaneers	73.5 1292	3-3	2-2	25.5	34.3	3.6-4.3	2.8%	—
8		235	Alvin (4) Yellowjackets	64.2 678	0-6	0-4	17.5	48.0	0.7-7.3	< 2%	—
9		237	Pasadena Sam Rayburn (8) Texans	63.6 637	1-6	0-5	15.0	38.0	0.4-7.6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Brazoswood’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2009

10-4

Rating 628 (84th)

#2 · 2006

11-2

Rating 606 (79th)

#3 · 2007

9-2

Rating 582 (72nd)

#4 · 2010

4-6

Rating 551 (62nd)

#5 · 2022

7-4

Rating 533 (56th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	4-6	1269	24.3	37.0	−12.7	1513	−6.7	+7.0	−13.7	1158	−2.88	+0.40	−3.27	456(30th)
2024	2-8	1239	24.7	45.3	−20.6	1524	−4.2	+15.6	−19.8	1005	−4.90	+0.18	−5.08	435(23rd)
2023	3-7	1032	24.2	31.9	−7.7	1323	−4.8	+9.2	−14.0	1149	−4.99	+0.04	−5.03	438(24th)
2022	7-4	1535	40.7	33.5	+7.2	1375	+12.4	+9.4	+3.0	1576	−0.65	+0.49	−1.14	533(56th)
2021	4-6	1074	21.7	29.7	−8.0	1461	−7.6	+0.9	−8.5	1288	−3.26	+0.29	−3.55	449(27th)
2020	1-8	775	10.8	34.4	−23.7	1474	−16.2	+8.6	−24.8	880	−5.62	+0.11	−5.74	364(9th)
2019	0-10	807	4.9	43.9	−39.0	1606	−20.0	+14.7	−34.7	634	−7.24	0.00	−7.24	339(6th)
2018	1-9	1065	13.4	37.6	−24.2	1556	−13.7	+8.8	−22.5	937	−6.00	+0.06	−6.06	404(16th)
2017	2-6	1129	17.6	32.4	−14.8	1503	−8.6	+6.2	−14.8	1131	−4.10	+0.11	−4.21	436(23rd)
2016	4-6	1285	16.5	23.8	−7.3	1462	−11.7	−3.3	−8.4	1289	−3.31	+0.30	−3.62	471(33rd)
2015	4-6	1273	26.0	31.8	−5.8	1565	−2.8	+1.3	−4.1	1397	−2.88	+0.71	−3.59	483(38th)
2014	4-6	1472	31.9	38.3	−6.4	1573	+5.9	+8.6	−2.7	1431	−3.33	+0.57	−3.90	507(47th)
2013	3-7	1230	27.8	32.5	−4.7	1464	−1.1	+6.1	−7.2	1319	−4.46	+0.34	−4.81	471(34th)
2012	6-5	1444	28.2	28.9	−0.7	1486	−0.8	+1.3	−2.1	1448	−2.41	+0.76	−3.16	508(47th)
2011	4-6	1449	22.5	27.9	−5.4	1553	−4.4	−0.6	−3.9	1403	−3.19	+0.56	−3.76	505(46th)
2010	4-6	1490	28.8	25.9	+2.9	1662	+3.6	−5.2	+8.8	1720	−3.15	+0.39	−3.54	551(62nd)
2009	10-4	1956	30.1	19.2	+10.9	1594	+5.5	−9.2	+14.7	1867	+0.11	+2.85	−2.75	628(84th)
2008	3-6	1474	21.3	24.0	−2.7	1480	−2.7	+0.1	−2.8	1430	−4.28	+0.25	−4.53	511(48th)
2007	9-2	1811	26.5	17.4	+9.2	1430	+2.2	−5.3	+7.5	1688	+0.22	+1.20	−0.98	582(72nd)
2006	11-2	1887	25.2	15.9	+9.2	1462	0.0	−8.4	+8.4	1710	+1.40	+2.45	−1.05	606(79th)
2005	4-6	1229	16.7	20.9	−4.2	1396	−8.2	+0.5	−8.6	1284	−3.73	+0.61	−4.34	473(34th)
2004	3-7	1305	13.4	22.0	−8.6	1480	−12.0	−1.8	−10.2	1245	−4.99	+0.21	−5.20	476(35th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.