| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Inglewood (CA) |
95% (+28) | W 33-26 | — | — | — | +0.26 | — |
| 2 | Euless Trinity (4-2) 1869 |
85% (+16) | W 35-10 | 2439 | +15.7 | −21.8 | +0.54 | — |
| 3 | 49% (0) | L 40-49 | 2199 | +18.8 | −9.1 | — | −0.12 | |
| 5 | Midland Lee (4-3) 1669 |
89% (+20) | W 49-6 | 2621 | +18.1 | −26.8 | +0.39 | — |
| 6 | #42Round Rock (4-2) 2019 |
69% (+7) | W 38-17 | 2472 | +13.3 | −25.5 | +0.72 | — |
| 7 | @Round Rock Westwood (1-6) 1059 |
> 98% (+51) | W 57-0 | 2467 | +21.8 | −16.8 | +0.04 | — |
| 8 | Round Rock McNeil (0-7) 1099 |
> 98% (+49) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | 76% (+11) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 10 | Round Rock Cedar Ridge (7-0) 1852 |
88% (+19) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Round Rock Stony Point (3-4) 1335 |
> 98% (+40) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#15
was #15
Record
5-1
2-0 district
Elo
2332
#15 of 249
OVR Grade
89.2
#15 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
87.4
#22 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
92
#12 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2440
#14 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 25-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Austin Westlake’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2021
16-0
Rating 990 (100th)
#2 · 2020
14-0
Rating 955 (100th)
#3 · 2019
15-1
Rating 853 (99th)
#4 · 2022
14-1
Rating 845 (99th)
#5 · 2024
14-2
Rating 823 (99th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.