| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70% (+8) | W 28-21 | 2548 | +16.9 | −25.1 | +0.61 | — | |
| 2 | #18San Antonio Johnson (5-0) 2290 |
57% (+3) | L 7-38 | 1496 | −7.2 | −7.0 | — | −0.23 |
| 3 | @Liberty Hill |
82% (+14) | W 45-14 | 2371 | +18.9 | −15.9 | +0.36 | — |
| 4 | #42Round Rock (4-2) 2019 |
58% (+3) | L 38-41 | 1872 | +13.3 | −1.5 | — | −0.33 |
| 6 | Georgetown East View (2-4) 1209 |
97% (+33) | W 28-14 | 1585 | −5.6 | −9.0 | +0.06 | — |
| 7 | @Cedar Park Vista Ridge (2-5) 1360 |
94% (+27) | W 49-20 | 1910 | +4.8 | −11.6 | +0.12 | — |
| 8 | #29Cedar Park (7-0) 2096 |
46% (-2) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Leander (1-5) 798 |
> 98% (+50) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Leander Rouse (4-3) 1600 |
87% (+18) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Hutto (5-2) 1894 |
66% (+6) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#34
was #39
Record
4-2
2-0 district
Elo
2056
#34 of 249
OVR Grade
85
#34 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
79.8
#77 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
85
#37 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1964
#53 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 24-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Austin Vandegrift’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2024
15-1
Rating 785 (98th)
#2 · 2022
14-2
Rating 780 (98th)
#3 · 2023
10-1
Rating 761 (98th)
#4 · 2021
12-2
Rating 747 (97th)
#5 · 2025
12-3
Rating 709 (95th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.