← Back

CLASS 6A · District 26-6A

Austin Del Valle Cardinals

Enrollment: 3,782 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1

Rank

#220

was #220

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

904

#220 of 249

OVR Grade

67.6

#220 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	San Antonio Taft (0-0) 1164	25% (-10)	—	—	—	—
2	@Killeen Shoemaker	4% (-30)	—	—	—	—
3	Pflugerville	31% (-8)	—	—	—	—
4	Elgin	89% (+20)	—	—	—	—
6	Austin Akins (0-0) 892	51% (+1)	—	—	—	—
7	@Buda Johnson (0-0) 1331	14% (-17)	—	—	—	—
8	Austin High (0-0) 1099	31% (-8)	—	—	—	—
9	@Austin Bowie (0-0) 1700	3% (-32)	—	—	—	—
10	Buda Hays Consolidated (0-0) 1593	5% (-28)	—	—	—	—
11	@#26Dripping Springs (0-0) 2147	< 2% (-50)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 26-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		26	Dripping Springs (4) Tigers	86.4 2147	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.7-0.3	> 98%	D2
2		74	Austin Bowie (3) Bulldogs	79.6 1700	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.4-1.6	> 98%	D1
3		95	Buda Hays Consolidated (5) Hawks	78 1593	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-2	96.8%	D2
4		159	Buda Johnson (2) Jaguars	74.1 1331	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.9-3.1	75.8%	D1
5		196	Austin High (7) Maroons	70.6 1099	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.9-4.1	20.2%	—
6		220	Austin Del Valle (1) Cardinals	67.6 904	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-5	4.7%	—
7		222	Austin Akins (6) Eagles	67.4 892	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-5	4%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Austin Del Valle’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2019

5-5

Rating 540 (59th)

#2 · 2012

4-7

Rating 509 (48th)

#3 · 2020

3-6

Rating 507 (47th)

#4 · 2017

5-5

Rating 493 (42nd)

#5 · 2018

4-6

Rating 479 (36th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	803	16.5	41.6	−25.1	1455	−11.4	+14.6	−26.0	850	−4.89	+0.02	−4.91	374(10th)
2024	3-7	1011	18.6	35.0	−16.4	1436	−12.0	+7.1	−19.0	1024	−3.95	+0.04	−3.99	416(19th)
2023	1-10	728	6.2	37.3	−31.1	1511	−19.9	+10.4	−30.3	743	−6.62	+0.00	−6.62	356(8th)
2022	2-9	1075	17.1	46.5	−29.4	1637	−8.0	+14.6	−22.6	936	−5.12	+0.03	−5.16	407(16th)
2021	2-8	1322	30.6	47.4	−16.8	1696	+3.7	+12.6	−8.9	1277	−4.78	+0.20	−4.98	470(33rd)
2020	3-6	1380	22.4	29.9	−7.4	1702	−2.6	−4.2	+1.6	1541	−2.81	+0.19	−3.00	507(47th)
2019	5-5	1441	42.3	35.6	+6.7	1552	+13.0	+4.5	+8.5	1712	−1.92	+0.22	−2.14	540(59th)
2018	4-6	1243	28.1	35.0	−6.9	1525	−0.8	+4.0	−4.7	1381	−2.86	+0.17	−3.02	479(36th)
2017	5-5	1184	32.3	20.2	+12.1	1227	−3.0	−4.1	+1.1	1528	−3.55	+0.23	−3.77	493(42nd)
2016	5-6	1280	28.0	32.9	−4.9	1295	−4.7	+8.4	−13.1	1173	−4.15	+0.26	−4.41	454(29th)
2015	2-8	964	13.6	37.6	−24.0	1593	−12.6	+7.4	−20.0	1000	−5.00	+0.06	−5.06	403(15th)
2014	3-7	1139	19.7	33.9	−14.2	1397	−11.8	+5.6	−17.4	1064	−4.46	+0.11	−4.57	428(21st)
2013	2-8	1050	16.7	30.6	−13.9	1427	−12.1	+4.5	−16.7	1084	−5.38	+0.17	−5.55	423(20th)
2012	4-7	1316	24.7	19.8	+4.9	1438	−2.9	−4.6	+1.8	1545	−4.39	+0.16	−4.55	509(48th)
2011	2-9	1070	21.3	33.9	−12.6	1407	−8.6	+8.4	−17.0	1075	−6.80	+0.08	−6.88	426(21st)
2010	2-8	1075	26.7	30.1	−3.4	1460	−2.8	+3.3	−6.1	1346	−5.87	+0.08	−5.95	464(32nd)
2009	0-1	965	7.0	21.0	−14.0	1328	−20.2	+0.2	−20.4	990	−0.81	0.00	−0.81	—
2008	0-1	953	19.0	59.0	−40.0	1419	−14.1	+28.9	−42.9	427	−0.78	0.00	−0.78	—
2005	0-3	882	15.7	34.0	−18.3	1356	−16.8	+7.4	−24.3	893	−2.64	0.00	−2.64	—
2004	0-3	965	9.0	35.3	−26.3	1329	−20.5	+13.7	−34.2	646	−2.78	0.00	−2.78	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.