← Back
CLASS 6A · District 26-6A

Austin Del Valle Cardinals

Enrollment: 3,782 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1
Rank
#234
was #233
Record
1-5
1-1 district
Elo
681
#234 of 249
OVR Grade
64.2
#234 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
60.6
#236 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
57
#234 of 249 in 6A
Perf
460
#240 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
San Antonio Taft (4-3) 1192
 25% (-10) L 21-27 966 −14.0 +7.4 — −0.95
2
@Killeen Shoemaker
 4% (-31) L 0-67 -17 −24.8 +35.8 — −0.70
3
Pflugerville
 25% (-10) L 14-62 -16 −20.3 +40.3 — −0.95
4
Elgin
 84% (+16) L 7-15 359 −39.8 +5.8 — −1.00
6
Austin Akins (1-5) 282
 78% (+12) W 69-0 1674 +6.0 −1.0 +0.00 —
7
@Buda Johnson (2-5) 1279
 9% (-22) L 7-63 -209 −29.9 +38.4 — −0.92
8
Austin High (1-5) 1184
 11% (-20) — — — — — —
9
@Austin Bowie (5-1) 1816
 < 2% (-45) — — — — — —
10
Buda Hays Consolidated (4-3) 1432
 4% (-30) — — — — — —
11
@#26Dripping Springs (5-1) 2153
 < 2% (-59) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 26-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 26
Tigers
86.5
2153
 5-1 3-0 49.0 15.7 5.8-0.2 > 98% D2
2 65
Bulldogs
81.4
1816
 5-1 2-0 45.2 18.5 5.1-0.9 > 98% D1
3 137
Hawks
75.6
1432
 4-3 1-2 34.0 25.9 3-3 92.8% D2
4 168
Jaguars
73.3
1279
 2-5 1-2 24.1 38.7 2.7-3.3 58.5% D1
5 180
Maroons
71.8
1184
 1-5 1-2 16.3 31.7 3.3-2.7 48.1% —
6 234
Cardinals
64.2
681
 1-5 1-1 19.7 39.0 1.2-4.8 < 2% —
7 248
Eagles
58.2
282
 1-5 0-2 13.7 52.3 0-6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Austin Del Valle’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2019
5-5
Rating 540 (59th)
#2 · 2012
4-7
Rating 509 (48th)
#3 · 2020
3-6
Rating 507 (47th)
#4 · 2017
5-5
Rating 493 (42nd)
#5 · 2018
4-6
Rating 479 (36th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-8 803 16.5 41.6 −25.1 1455 −11.4 +14.6 −26.0 850 −4.89 +0.02 −4.91 374(10th)
2024 3-7 1011 18.6 35.0 −16.4 1436 −12.0 +7.1 −19.0 1024 −3.95 +0.04 −3.99 416(19th)
2023 1-10 728 6.2 37.3 −31.1 1511 −19.9 +10.4 −30.3 743 −6.62 +0.00 −6.62 356(8th)
2022 2-9 1075 17.1 46.5 −29.4 1637 −8.0 +14.6 −22.6 936 −5.12 +0.03 −5.16 407(16th)
2021 2-8 1322 30.6 47.4 −16.8 1696 +3.7 +12.6 −8.9 1277 −4.78 +0.20 −4.98 470(33rd)
2020 3-6 1380 22.4 29.9 −7.4 1702 −2.6 −4.2 +1.6 1541 −2.81 +0.19 −3.00 507(47th)
2019 5-5 1441 42.3 35.6 +6.7 1552 +13.0 +4.5 +8.5 1712 −1.92 +0.22 −2.14 540(59th)
2018 4-6 1243 28.1 35.0 −6.9 1525 −0.8 +4.0 −4.7 1381 −2.86 +0.17 −3.02 479(36th)
2017 5-5 1184 32.3 20.2 +12.1 1227 −3.0 −4.1 +1.1 1528 −3.55 +0.23 −3.77 493(42nd)
2016 5-6 1280 28.0 32.9 −4.9 1295 −4.7 +8.4 −13.1 1173 −4.15 +0.26 −4.41 454(29th)
2015 2-8 964 13.6 37.6 −24.0 1593 −12.6 +7.4 −20.0 1000 −5.00 +0.06 −5.06 403(15th)
2014 3-7 1139 19.7 33.9 −14.2 1397 −11.8 +5.6 −17.4 1064 −4.46 +0.11 −4.57 428(21st)
2013 2-8 1050 16.7 30.6 −13.9 1427 −12.1 +4.5 −16.7 1084 −5.38 +0.17 −5.55 423(20th)
2012 4-7 1316 24.7 19.8 +4.9 1438 −2.9 −4.6 +1.8 1545 −4.39 +0.16 −4.55 509(48th)
2011 2-9 1070 21.3 33.9 −12.6 1407 −8.6 +8.4 −17.0 1075 −6.80 +0.08 −6.88 426(21st)
2010 2-8 1075 26.7 30.1 −3.4 1460 −2.8 +3.3 −6.1 1346 −5.87 +0.08 −5.95 464(32nd)
2009 0-1 965 7.0 21.0 −14.0 1328 −20.2 +0.2 −20.4 990 −0.81 0.00 −0.81 —
2008 0-1 953 19.0 59.0 −40.0 1419 −14.1 +28.9 −42.9 427 −0.78 0.00 −0.78 —
2005 0-3 882 15.7 34.0 −18.3 1356 −16.8 +7.4 −24.3 893 −2.64 0.00 −2.64 —
2004 0-3 965 9.0 35.3 −26.3 1329 −20.5 +13.7 −34.2 646 −2.78 0.00 −2.78 —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.