← Back

CLASS 6A · District 26-6A

Austin Bowie Bulldogs

Enrollment: 2,869 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3

Rank

#74

was #74

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1700

#74 of 249

OVR Grade

79.6

#74 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Round Rock McNeil (0-0) 1523	68% (+7)	—	—	—	—
2	@Cedar Park Vista Ridge (0-0) 1601	60% (+4)	—	—	—	—
3	Converse Judson (0-0) 1481	71% (+9)	—	—	—	—
4	@Round Rock Stony Point (0-0) 1159	91% (+22)	—	—	—	—
5	@Austin High (0-0) 1099	93% (+24)	—	—	—	—
7	Buda Hays Consolidated (0-0) 1593	61% (+4)	—	—	—	—
8	@#26Dripping Springs (0-0) 2147	13% (-18)	—	—	—	—
9	Austin Del Valle (0-0) 904	97% (+32)	—	—	—	—
10	@Austin Akins (0-0) 892	97% (+32)	—	—	—	—
11	Buda Johnson (0-0) 1331	82% (+15)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 26-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		26	Dripping Springs (4) Tigers	86.4 2147	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.7-0.3	> 98%	D2
2		74	Austin Bowie (3) Bulldogs	79.6 1700	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.4-1.6	> 98%	D1
3		95	Buda Hays Consolidated (5) Hawks	78 1593	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-2	96.8%	D2
4		159	Buda Johnson (2) Jaguars	74.1 1331	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.9-3.1	75.8%	D1
5		196	Austin High (7) Maroons	70.6 1099	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.9-4.1	20.2%	—
6		220	Austin Del Valle (1) Cardinals	67.6 904	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-5	4.7%	—
7		222	Austin Akins (6) Eagles	67.4 892	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-5	4%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Austin Bowie’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021

10-3

Rating 655 (88th)

#2 · 2016

11-2

Rating 641 (86th)

#3 · 2022

7-3

Rating 622 (83rd)

#4 · 2007

8-3

Rating 615 (81st)

#5 · 2010

8-5

Rating 615 (81st)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	6-5	1614	31.9	23.8	+8.1	1512	+3.3	−4.1	+7.4	1686	−1.22	+0.28	−1.50	558(65th)
2024	6-4	1548	32.9	27.2	+5.7	1525	+5.1	−1.6	+6.8	1669	−0.90	+0.54	−1.44	550(62nd)
2023	4-7	1341	22.0	29.4	−7.4	1454	−4.1	+4.8	−8.9	1278	−3.88	+0.17	−4.05	483(38th)
2022	7-3	1903	34.3	19.3	+15.0	1640	+8.5	−11.3	+19.9	1997	+0.67	+1.07	−0.40	622(83rd)
2021	10-3	2086	33.2	19.7	+13.5	1725	+6.7	−15.9	+22.6	2065	+2.61	+2.89	−0.28	655(88th)
2020	3-5	1586	28.1	31.9	−3.8	1706	+3.3	−3.0	+6.3	1657	−2.02	+0.22	−2.24	541(59th)
2019	5-6	1623	26.5	32.5	−6.0	1691	−0.3	−1.6	+1.3	1532	−1.82	+0.42	−2.24	533(56th)
2018	7-4	1792	35.5	22.5	+12.9	1629	+8.6	−9.3	+17.9	1948	−0.39	+0.53	−0.92	604(79th)
2017	8-3	1815	33.2	27.6	+5.5	1513	+4.3	−2.5	+6.8	1671	−0.15	+1.11	−1.26	570(68th)
2016	11-2	2116	35.6	20.5	+15.1	1536	+8.2	−8.6	+16.7	1918	+1.98	+2.06	−0.08	641(86th)
2015	8-3	1888	34.2	20.9	+13.3	1553	+8.1	−7.6	+15.7	1893	+0.55	+1.12	−0.57	605(79th)
2014	9-3	1956	31.8	20.9	+10.9	1492	+2.9	−8.2	+11.1	1777	+0.64	+1.95	−1.31	601(78th)
2013	9-2	1818	35.8	21.2	+14.6	1450	+6.6	−6.0	+12.6	1816	+1.50	+2.50	−1.00	590(75th)
2012	7-5	1679	22.2	21.9	+0.2	1617	−1.1	−6.0	+4.9	1622	−0.96	+0.96	−1.93	564(67th)
2011	6-5	1654	22.7	21.8	+0.9	1594	−2.8	−5.8	+2.9	1574	−1.68	+0.56	−2.24	546(61st)
2010	8-5	2033	27.5	24.2	+3.4	1625	+1.8	−8.3	+10.1	1752	−0.14	+2.69	−2.82	615(81st)
2009	8-4	1863	27.1	19.3	+7.8	1551	+2.7	−7.7	+10.3	1758	−0.19	+2.27	−2.46	600(77th)
2008	8-3	1838	38.8	21.1	+17.7	1478	+11.3	−6.2	+17.4	1936	+0.11	+2.20	−2.09	611(80th)
2007	8-3	1755	31.3	13.5	+17.7	1478	+3.9	−12.4	+16.3	1908	−0.16	+1.56	−1.72	615(81st)
2006	4-6	1430	18.5	25.7	−7.2	1554	−6.8	−2.0	−4.8	1381	−3.55	+0.47	−4.02	503(45th)
2005	4-6	1423	27.8	26.9	+0.9	1397	−2.9	0.0	−2.9	1427	−4.10	+0.24	−4.34	509(48th)
2004	5-6	1451	21.5	14.7	+6.7	1385	−6.3	−7.2	+0.9	1524	−4.29	+0.46	−4.74	537(58th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.