← Back
CLASS 6A · District 26-6A

Austin Akins Eagles

Enrollment: 2,317 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6
Rank
#248
was #248
Record
1-5
0-2 district
Elo
282
#248 of 249
OVR Grade
58.2
#248 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
55.4
#248 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
43.4
#249 of 249 in 6A
Perf
-126
#248 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@Kyle Lehman
 49% (0) L 0-41 -230 −42.1 +27.1 — −0.98
2
Austin LASA
 94% (+27) W 55-12 1168 −1.2 +12.0 +0.00 —
3
@Leander (1-5) 798
 67% (+7) L 0-56 -541 −38.1 +43.6 — −0.99
4
@Austin Crockett
 79% (+13) L 27-61 -369 −21.4 +53.4 — −1.00
5
#26Dripping Springs (5-1) 2153
 < 2% (-72) L 0-75 369 −16.6 +28.7 — −0.23
6
@Austin Del Valle (1-5) 681
 22% (-12) L 0-69 -1155 −47.7 +58.5 — −0.99
8
Buda Johnson (2-5) 1279
 < 2% (-40) — — — — — —
9
@Austin High (1-5) 1184
 2% (-36) — — — — — —
10
Austin Bowie (5-1) 1816
 < 2% (-61) — — — — — —
11
@Buda Hays Consolidated (4-3) 1432
 < 2% (-46) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 26-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 26
Tigers
86.5
2153
 5-1 3-0 49.0 15.7 5.8-0.2 > 98% D2
2 65
Bulldogs
81.4
1816
 5-1 2-0 45.2 18.5 5.1-0.9 > 98% D1
3 137
Hawks
75.6
1432
 4-3 1-2 34.0 25.9 3-3 92.8% D2
4 168
Jaguars
73.3
1279
 2-5 1-2 24.1 38.7 2.7-3.3 58.5% D1
5 180
Maroons
71.8
1184
 1-5 1-2 16.3 31.7 3.3-2.7 48.1% —
6 234
Cardinals
64.2
681
 1-5 1-1 19.7 39.0 1.2-4.8 < 2% —
7 248
Eagles
58.2
282
 1-5 0-2 13.7 52.3 0-6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Austin Akins’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2015
4-6
Rating 446 (27th)
#2 · 2021
4-6
Rating 442 (25th)
#3 · 2004
3-7
Rating 437 (24th)
#4 · 2006
2-8
Rating 429 (22nd)
#5 · 2018
4-6
Rating 428 (21st)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 4-6 785 20.4 30.5 −10.1 1198 −13.3 +8.8 −22.1 948 −2.93 +0.06 −2.99 385(12th)
2024 3-7 644 14.7 38.8 −24.1 1264 −18.6 +14.3 −32.9 676 −4.10 +0.01 −4.11 337(6th)
2023 0-10 478 5.5 44.3 −38.8 1499 −21.2 +17.3 −38.5 538 −6.95 0.00 −6.95 307(3rd)
2022 0-10 627 5.4 55.5 −50.1 1679 −19.5 +22.6 −42.1 447 −6.27 0.00 −6.27 301(3rd)
2021 4-6 1133 20.3 37.8 −17.5 1652 −8.5 +3.7 −12.2 1194 −2.67 +0.55 −3.23 442(25th)
2020 1-7 901 11.2 38.4 −27.1 1702 −14.1 +4.4 −18.5 1038 −4.62 +0.06 −4.68 397(14th)
2019 2-8 954 19.8 37.2 −17.4 1561 −9.7 +5.0 −14.7 1132 −4.89 +0.02 −4.91 419(19th)
2018 4-6 1035 19.8 34.9 −15.1 1500 −9.8 +4.8 −14.6 1134 −3.06 +0.10 −3.17 428(21st)
2017 3-8 1093 25.4 37.8 −12.5 1343 −6.8 +11.4 −18.1 1046 −5.62 +0.27 −5.89 421(20th)
2016 2-8 744 18.2 33.6 −15.4 1266 −15.7 +10.0 −25.7 858 −6.74 +0.28 −7.02 364(9th)
2015 4-6 1126 19.1 29.6 −10.5 1483 −9.1 +2.0 −11.1 1221 −3.13 +0.15 −3.29 446(27th)
2014 2-8 809 23.4 41.2 −17.8 1403 −8.5 +13.2 −21.7 957 −5.45 +0.10 −5.55 383(12th)
2013 3-8 801 21.3 44.5 −23.2 1469 −6.4 +18.1 −24.4 890 −4.93 +0.17 −5.11 375(10th)
2012 1-9 610 12.0 36.6 −24.6 1459 −15.0 +11.1 −26.1 848 −6.89 +0.21 −7.10 352(8th)
2011 0-9 629 6.9 48.6 −41.7 1408 −22.1 +23.2 −45.3 368 −7.33 0.00 −7.33 293(2nd)
2010 0-10 723 17.1 48.8 −31.7 1504 −11.5 +20.1 −31.6 711 −7.48 0.00 −7.48 347(7th)
2009 1-7 934 14.4 39.0 −24.6 1637 −8.1 +10.9 −19.0 1025 −4.71 +0.17 −4.88 407(16th)
2008 1-9 746 11.4 42.0 −30.6 1453 −16.9 +15.0 −31.9 702 −6.63 +0.05 −6.68 348(7th)
2007 1-9 927 16.7 33.1 −16.4 1386 −12.8 +7.8 −20.6 986 −7.34 +0.07 −7.41 404(16th)
2006 2-8 980 20.9 35.1 −14.2 1486 −5.9 +8.8 −14.8 1131 −6.19 +0.24 −6.42 429(22nd)
2005 3-7 979 23.0 32.0 −9.0 1300 −10.4 +6.1 −16.5 1086 −5.37 +0.14 −5.50 423(20th)
2004 3-7 1055 22.6 28.7 −6.1 1280 −7.5 +7.7 −15.2 1121 −5.66 +0.15 −5.81 437(24th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.