← Back

CLASS 6A · District 3-6A

Arlington Bowie Volunteers

Enrollment: 2,300 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7

Rank

#75

was #75

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1696

#75 of 249

OVR Grade

79.6

#75 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Prosper Rock Hill (0-0) 1453	73% (+10)	—	—	—	—
2	South Grand Prairie (0-0) 1816	38% (-5)	—	—	—	—
3	Fort Worth Haltom (0-0) 1386	79% (+12)	—	—	—	—
4	@Arlington Lamar (0-0) 1658	54% (+2)	—	—	—	—
5	Granbury (0-0) 811	98% (+35)	—	—	—	—
7	@#22Aledo (0-0) 2165	12% (-19)	—	—	—	—
8	@Arlington Martin (0-0) 1633	57% (+3)	—	—	—	—
9	Arlington (0-0) 1475	72% (+9)	—	—	—	—
10	@Weatherford (0-0) 1179	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—
11	Arlington Sam Houston (0-0) 659	> 98% (+41)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 3-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		22	Aledo (6) Bearcats	86.6 2165	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D2
2		75	Arlington Bowie (7) Volunteers	79.6 1696	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.8-2.2	88.7%	D2
3		84	Arlington Lamar (5) Vikings	79 1658	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	83.7%	D1
4		86	Arlington Martin (2) Warriors	78.6 1633	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.5-2.5	79.6%	D1
5		124	Arlington (3) Colts	76.2 1475	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.7-3.3	42.6%	—
6		182	Weatherford (4) Kangaroos	71.8 1179	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-4.7	5.4%	—
7		226	Granbury (8) Pirates	66.2 811	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		241	Arlington Sam Houston (1) Texans	63.9 659	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.5-6.5	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Arlington Bowie’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2007

12-2

Rating 726 (96th)

#2 · 2012

11-2

Rating 697 (94th)

#3 · 2008

11-2

Rating 677 (91st)

#4 · 2009

11-3

Rating 667 (90th)

#5 · 2011

9-4

Rating 658 (89th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	8-3	1753	37.3	26.6	+10.6	1364	+4.9	−1.1	+6.1	1652	−0.50	+1.56	−2.06	567(68th)
2024	8-4	1807	44.1	32.4	+11.7	1455	+12.4	+2.5	+9.9	1748	−0.65	+1.44	−2.08	586(74th)
2023	7-4	1586	29.7	23.5	+6.2	1316	−3.2	−0.9	−2.3	1442	−1.88	+0.62	−2.51	527(54th)
2022	5-6	1523	34.5	33.2	+1.4	1574	+7.3	+3.2	+4.1	1603	−2.79	+0.58	−3.37	536(57th)
2021	2-8	1445	25.1	45.3	−20.2	1859	+1.3	+8.3	−6.9	1327	−3.24	+0.23	−3.48	502(45th)
2020	7-2	1928	27.9	22.2	+5.7	1734	+5.1	−10.7	+15.8	1895	+1.52	+1.89	−0.36	615(81st)
2019	8-4	1799	36.2	24.8	+11.4	1715	+10.0	−9.4	+19.3	1984	+0.88	+1.87	−0.99	609(80th)
2018	6-5	1681	31.7	25.7	+6.0	1636	+4.1	−7.1	+11.2	1779	−0.34	+1.27	−1.61	572(69th)
2017	3-7	1528	26.4	30.8	−4.4	1638	+1.9	0.0	+1.9	1548	−3.27	+0.26	−3.54	526(54th)
2016	10-3	1934	29.5	24.0	+5.5	1655	+2.5	−9.8	+12.3	1807	+2.49	+3.37	−0.88	604(78th)
2015	6-5	1731	32.7	30.7	+2.0	1682	+6.9	−4.7	+11.5	1789	−0.77	+0.84	−1.61	577(71st)
2014	7-4	1920	45.0	32.7	+12.3	1630	+14.2	−2.8	+17.1	1926	+0.19	+1.34	−1.14	613(81st)
2013	7-4	1959	43.0	23.8	+19.2	1605	+13.6	−9.0	+22.6	2065	+0.67	+1.94	−1.27	637(85th)
2012	11-2	2265	43.3	18.6	+24.7	1681	+17.4	−14.1	+31.4	2286	+3.50	+3.98	−0.48	697(94th)
2011	9-4	2025	37.6	17.0	+20.6	1578	+10.2	−11.6	+21.9	2047	+0.61	+1.89	−1.28	658(89th)
2010	7-4	1869	35.4	25.5	+9.8	1604	+7.0	−5.6	+12.6	1815	+0.03	+1.23	−1.20	599(77th)
2009	11-3	2137	37.8	23.4	+14.4	1649	+12.3	−9.0	+21.3	2033	+1.54	+2.52	−0.97	667(90th)
2008	11-2	2087	42.0	16.2	+25.8	1597	+14.4	−13.2	+27.6	2191	+1.86	+2.41	−0.55	677(91st)
2007	12-2	2210	37.9	13.1	+24.9	1699	+15.0	−17.6	+32.7	2316	+3.58	+3.93	−0.35	726(96th)
2006	7-4	1681	30.1	28.9	+1.2	1602	+5.6	−1.3	+6.9	1674	−0.42	+1.43	−1.85	565(67th)
2005	1-8	1100	20.9	41.6	−20.7	1547	−4.3	+14.0	−18.3	1042	−5.54	+0.06	−5.60	429(22nd)
2004	1-9	1038	12.9	38.5	−25.6	1556	−11.3	+10.9	−22.1	946	−5.85	+0.13	−5.98	412(18th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.