| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | #7Duncanville (3-3) 2485 |
31% (-8) | W 26-7 | 2962 | +21.1 | −37.4 | +0.97 | — |
| 2 | DeSoto |
53% (+1) | W 50-6 | 3651 | +43.0 | −43.0 | +0.97 | — |
| 3 | 86% (+17) | W 56-35 | 2810 | +42.2 | −10.2 | +0.90 | — | |
| 4 | 85% (+17) | W 51-21 | 3174 | +29.8 | −37.1 | +0.91 | — | |
| 5 | Princeton (2-4) 1089 |
> 98% (+67) | W 65-7 | 2600 | +31.6 | −12.4 | +0.06 | — |
| 7 | McKinney (1-5) 1457 |
> 98% (+56) | W 70-3 | 3102 | +35.5 | −28.5 | +0.16 | — |
| 8 | @Prosper Rock Hill (3-3) 1541 |
> 98% (+53) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | Dallas Jesuit (4-2) 1660 |
> 98% (+48) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @McKinney Boyd (2-4) 1298 |
> 98% (+62) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | #31Prosper Walnut Grove (5-1) 2078 |
96% (+31) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#2
was #1
Record
6-0
3-0 district
Elo
2857
#2 of 249
OVR Grade
97.1
#2 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
98.8
#1 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
98.9
#3 of 249 in 6A
Perf
3050
#1 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 6-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Allen’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2013
16-0
Rating 945 (100th)
#2 · 2014
16-0
Rating 907 (100th)
#3 · 2017
16-0
Rating 899 (100th)
#4 · 2012
15-1
Rating 850 (99th)
#5 · 2015
14-1
Rating 833 (99th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.