← Back
CLASS 6A · District 14-6A

Aldine MacArthur Generals

Enrollment: 3,771 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1
Rank
#210
was #211
Record
4-2
1-2 district
Elo
943
#210 of 249
OVR Grade
68.2
#210 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
67.2
#205 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
66
#202 of 249 in 6A
Perf
957
#205 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@Cy Ridge (3-3) 644
49% (0) W 48-14 1385 −2.0 +2.6 +0.01 —
2
Channelview (0-7) 780
40% (-4) W 37-28 761 −15.6 +13.9 +0.02 —
3
New Caney Porter
29% (-9) W 28-27 1157 −7.4 +6.4 +0.05 —
5
Aldine Davis (5-1) 1655
8% (-24) L 20-49 856 −5.6 +20.1 — −0.75
6
@Aldine Eisenhower (3-3) 1292
20% (-13) L 16-37 652 −13.1 +20.8 — −0.91
7
@Aldine (0-6) 143
96% (+31) W 34-0 929 −23.0 −0.2 +0.00 —
8
Spring (2-4) 1061
38% (-5) — — — — — —
9
@Spring Dekaney (3-3) 1327
17% (-15) — — — — — —
10
Aldine Nimitz (3-3) 1518
8% (-23) — — — — — —
11
@#49Spring Westfield (4-2) 1956
< 2% (-41) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 14-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 49
Mustangs
83.5
1956
4-2 3-0 24.8 6.2 6.7-0.3 > 98% D2
2 92
Falcons
78.9
1655
5-1 3-0 34.7 19.5 5.6-1.4 > 98% D1
3 119
Cougars
76.9
1518
3-3 2-1 23.8 27.0 4.9-2.1 96.9% D1
4 159
Wildcats
74
1327
3-3 1-2 18.5 20.3 3.4-3.6 62.9% D2
5 164
Eagles
73.5
1292
3-3 1-2 17.5 25.2 2.9-4.1 28.1% —
6 200
Lions
70
1061
2-4 1-2 19.8 34.0 2.8-4.2 10% —
7 210
Generals
68.2
943
4-2 1-2 30.5 25.8 1.6-5.3 2.6% —
8 249
Mustangs
56.1
143
0-6 0-3 1.2 47.3 0-7 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Aldine MacArthur’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2005
8-3
Rating 564 (66th)
#2 · 2006
5-6
Rating 518 (51st)
#3 · 2007
4-6
Rating 515 (50th)
#4 · 2012
4-6
Rating 450 (28th)
#5 · 2013
5-5
Rating 442 (25th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-8 716 15.4 31.4 −16.0 1138 −18.6 +13.5 −32.1 698 −6.87 +0.02 −6.89 346(7th)
2024 2-8 730 12.0 34.5 −22.5 1264 −19.0 +13.8 −32.7 682 −6.12 +0.10 −6.22 345(7th)
2023 1-9 547 8.4 36.6 −28.2 1303 −24.0 +11.9 −35.9 603 −7.22 +0.00 −7.22 321(4th)
2022 2-8 762 10.3 31.7 −21.4 1329 −22.1 +7.3 −29.3 766 −6.02 +0.01 −6.04 355(8th)
2021 2-8 791 11.6 35.6 −24.0 1375 −19.5 +10.8 −30.3 741 −5.24 +0.04 −5.28 351(7th)
2020 2-4 969 15.8 33.5 −17.7 1309 −13.9 +12.0 −25.8 854 −2.81 +0.14 −2.95 —
2019 5-6 1112 17.6 28.6 −11.0 1387 −11.4 +2.9 −14.2 1144 −3.29 +0.17 −3.46 435(23rd)
2018 1-9 819 21.4 38.2 −16.8 1314 −9.3 +13.7 −23.0 926 −7.08 +0.00 −7.09 380(11th)
2017 2-6 1031 16.1 33.5 −17.4 1472 −8.1 +8.8 −16.9 1077 −3.56 +0.14 −3.70 419(19th)
2016 2-8 857 10.7 26.7 −16.0 1410 −16.9 +3.6 −20.5 988 −5.51 +0.07 −5.58 391(13th)
2015 2-8 826 14.7 29.9 −15.2 1341 −15.7 +7.0 −22.7 932 −6.13 +0.03 −6.16 381(11th)
2014 2-7 976 17.7 34.2 −16.6 1278 −13.2 +11.7 −24.9 877 −5.68 +0.03 −5.71 388(13th)
2013 5-5 1144 23.0 23.3 −0.3 1208 −9.8 +3.8 −13.6 1160 −4.09 +0.17 −4.26 442(25th)
2012 4-6 1148 23.5 27.8 −4.3 1296 −5.0 +6.3 −11.3 1218 −4.61 +0.15 −4.76 450(28th)
2011 2-7 1028 17.8 26.6 −8.8 1222 −11.6 +8.4 −20.1 999 −5.73 +0.06 −5.79 413(18th)
2010 2-8 952 22.1 32.4 −10.3 1241 −11.6 +10.0 −21.6 961 −6.54 +0.11 −6.65 402(15th)
2009 0-10 799 4.3 36.5 −32.2 1582 −18.3 +11.6 −29.9 752 −7.71 0.00 −7.71 359(8th)
2008 0-8 967 6.9 36.2 −29.4 1528 −15.9 +11.8 −27.6 810 −6.32 0.00 −6.32 382(12th)
2007 4-6 1435 22.9 21.1 +1.8 1383 −1.8 −0.7 −1.1 1472 −4.28 +0.40 −4.68 515(50th)
2006 5-6 1526 21.2 19.7 +1.5 1371 −5.1 −2.4 −2.7 1432 −4.02 +0.66 −4.68 518(51st)
2005 8-3 1565 22.4 11.9 +10.5 1321 −2.9 −7.2 +4.3 1607 −1.02 +1.13 −2.15 564(66th)
2004 2-8 1077 19.6 32.7 −13.1 1398 −6.9 +10.6 −17.5 1064 −6.22 +0.05 −6.28 432(22nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.