← Back
CLASS 6A · District 14-6A

Aldine Eisenhower Eagles

Enrollment: 2,748 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5
Rank
#164
was #160
Record
3-3
1-2 district
Elo
1292
#164 of 249
OVR Grade
73.5
#164 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
67
#207 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
72.6
#151 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1144
#178 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Klein Forest (1-6) 1176
 42% (-3) W 20-16 1044 −20.0 −1.7 +0.10 —
2
#27Klein (7-0) 2118
 9% (-23) L 0-37 1179 −11.3 +1.5 — −0.46
3
@Baytown Lee
 89% (+20) W 28-14 1133 −14.3 +0.3 +0.01 —
5
@#49Spring Westfield (4-2) 1956
 8% (-23) L 0-47 868 −7.1 +18.1 — −0.45
6
Aldine MacArthur (4-2) 943
 80% (+13) W 37-16 1560 −0.4 −2.8 +0.03 —
7
Spring (2-4) 1061
 79% (+13) L 20-21 1081 −15.0 +1.7 — −0.97
8
@Aldine Nimitz (3-3) 1518
 28% (-9) — — — — — —
9
Aldine Davis (5-1) 1655
 18% (-14) — — — — — —
10
@Aldine (0-6) 143
 > 98% (+46) — — — — — —
11
Spring Dekaney (3-3) 1327
 46% (-1) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 14-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 49
Mustangs
83.5
1956
 4-2 3-0 24.8 6.2 6.7-0.3 > 98% D2
2 92
Falcons
78.9
1655
 5-1 3-0 34.7 19.5 5.6-1.4 > 98% D1
3 119
Cougars
76.9
1518
 3-3 2-1 23.8 27.0 4.9-2.1 96.9% D1
4 159
Wildcats
74
1327
 3-3 1-2 18.5 20.3 3.4-3.6 62.9% D2
5 164
Eagles
73.5
1292
 3-3 1-2 17.5 25.2 2.9-4.1 28.1% —
6 200
Lions
70
1061
 2-4 1-2 19.8 34.0 2.8-4.2 10% —
7 210
Generals
68.2
943
 4-2 1-2 30.5 25.8 1.6-5.3 2.6% —
8 249
Mustangs
56.1
143
 0-6 0-3 1.2 47.3 0-7 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Aldine Eisenhower’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2008
7-3
Rating 619 (82nd)
#2 · 2007
8-4
Rating 600 (77th)
#3 · 2015
8-4
Rating 590 (75th)
#4 · 2014
8-3
Rating 556 (64th)
#5 · 2010
6-5
Rating 555 (64th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 6-5 1289 15.5 16.2 −0.7 1180 −18.8 −4.4 −14.3 1142 −3.19 +0.19 −3.39 464(31st)
2024 5-5 1075 18.4 21.9 −3.5 1206 −14.2 +1.9 −16.0 1100 −3.45 +0.10 −3.56 432(23rd)
2023 3-7 1096 17.6 24.1 −6.5 1379 −13.3 −2.3 −11.0 1226 −4.68 +0.16 −4.85 454(29th)
2022 5-6 1468 26.0 27.5 −1.5 1447 −4.0 −1.2 −2.8 1431 −3.55 +0.41 −3.96 508(47th)
2021 3-7 1107 31.8 36.4 −4.6 1402 +0.2 +10.0 −9.8 1255 −4.41 +0.12 −4.52 448(27th)
2020 3-4 1144 21.0 25.6 −4.6 1277 −9.5 +3.2 −12.7 1183 −2.94 +0.08 −3.03 —
2019 4-6 1307 26.1 29.3 −3.2 1443 −2.2 +2.9 −5.1 1372 −3.33 +0.41 −3.75 483(38th)
2018 5-6 1342 22.2 24.5 −2.3 1525 −6.1 −4.4 −1.7 1458 −2.61 +0.39 −3.00 498(43rd)
2017 4-5 1341 17.9 14.7 +3.2 1406 −8.2 −8.4 +0.2 1505 −2.71 +0.27 −2.98 515(50th)
2016 2-8 1266 17.1 25.8 −8.7 1423 −11.0 +2.0 −13.0 1176 −5.00 +0.02 −5.03 453(29th)
2015 8-4 1686 29.2 12.9 +16.3 1405 +1.6 −10.4 +12.0 1800 −1.08 +0.88 −1.96 590(75th)
2014 8-3 1512 22.9 11.2 +11.7 1399 −5.7 −11.1 +5.4 1634 −0.75 +1.53 −2.28 556(64th)
2013 4-7 1451 23.5 22.6 +0.9 1456 −4.9 −2.6 −2.3 1442 −4.07 +0.34 −4.40 507(47th)
2012 4-7 1376 18.2 27.7 −9.5 1638 −4.6 −0.8 −3.8 1405 −3.00 +0.55 −3.55 497(43rd)
2011 5-6 1424 23.5 30.1 −6.6 1558 −0.7 +4.7 −5.3 1367 −2.58 +0.83 −3.41 498(43rd)
2010 6-5 1693 37.6 35.5 +2.2 1584 +10.8 +6.3 +4.5 1613 −1.16 +0.60 −1.76 555(64th)
2009 6-5 1597 19.0 19.1 −0.1 1633 −2.7 −6.1 +3.5 1587 −1.46 +0.98 −2.45 542(59th)
2008 7-3 1880 33.9 20.2 +13.7 1633 +11.5 −7.2 +18.7 1968 +0.29 +1.17 −0.88 619(82nd)
2007 8-4 1798 30.8 21.2 +9.6 1568 +7.7 −4.5 +12.2 1806 +0.28 +1.56 −1.28 600(77th)
2006 3-7 1304 19.3 24.3 −5.0 1559 −4.2 −1.4 −2.8 1431 −3.59 +0.31 −3.90 498(43rd)
2005 3-7 1266 22.3 28.3 −6.0 1487 −2.9 +6.0 −8.9 1278 −4.54 +0.19 −4.73 475(35th)
2004 6-5 1495 18.5 21.5 −3.1 1514 −6.1 −2.9 −3.1 1421 −2.43 +0.97 −3.40 517(51st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.